Re: [RESENT PATCH] drm/panel: support Innolux P097PFG panel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi


On Friday, December 01, 2017 10:54 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
One more comment:

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:14:40PM +0800, Lin Huang wrote:
Support Innolux P097PFG 9.7" 1536x2048 TFT LCD panel,
it refactor Innolux P079ZCA panel driver, let it support
multi panel, and add support P097PFG panel in this driver.

Signed-off-by: Lin Huang <hl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 136 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c
index 6ba9344..a40798f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-innolux-p079zca.c
...

@@ -209,20 +284,39 @@ static const struct drm_panel_funcs innolux_panel_funcs = {
  };
static const struct of_device_id innolux_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "innolux,p079zca", },
-	{ }
+	{ .compatible = "innolux,p079zca",
+	  .data = &innolux_p079zca_panel_desc
+	},
+	{ .compatible = "innolux,p097pfg",
+	  .data = &innolux_p097pfg_panel_desc
+	}
  };
  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, innolux_of_match);
-static int innolux_panel_add(struct innolux_panel *innolux)
+static int innolux_panel_add(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
+			     const struct panel_desc_dsi *desc)
  {
-	struct device *dev = &innolux->link->dev;
+	struct innolux_panel *innolux;
+	struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
  	struct device_node *np;
  	int err;
- innolux->supply = devm_regulator_get(dev, "power");
-	if (IS_ERR(innolux->supply))
-		return PTR_ERR(innolux->supply);
+	innolux = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*innolux), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!innolux)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	innolux->dsi_desc = desc;
+	innolux->vddi = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "power");
+	if (IS_ERR(innolux->vddi))
+		return PTR_ERR(innolux->vddi);
+
+	innolux->avdd = devm_regulator_get(dev, "ppvarp");
This name ("ppvarp" and the "ppvarn" below) are names from our board
schematics, not from the panel datasheet. I would think these should be
"vdd" and "vee", like your variable names.
Okay, will fix it next version.

Brian

+	if (IS_ERR(innolux->avdd))
+		return PTR_ERR(innolux->avdd);
+
+	innolux->avee = devm_regulator_get(dev, "ppvarn");
+	if (IS_ERR(innolux->avee))
+		return PTR_ERR(innolux->avee);
innolux->enable_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "enable",
  						       GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
...





_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux