On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 18:29:14 +0100 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > I've discussed this a bit on irc and consensus seems to be "some ugliness > due to interface impendance mistmatches in the kernel? who cares ...". I > agree that there's not a fundamental problem with fourcc and planar yuv > that can't be fixed with a bunch of boilerplate code with the assorted set > of inconsistencies between drivers. So if this is the general consensus > I'll just look the other way, shut down my shields an recall my battle > ship out of LEO ... ;-) Rob, Joonyoung, Inkie, any comment on using fourcc vs rolling our own surface definitions? Thanks, -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
