On 11/27/2017 11:59 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 09:17:02AM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On 11/22/2017 04:47 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I wonder if it would be cleaner to extend virtio-gpu for this use case
instead of trying to pass buffers over AF_VSOCK.
By the way, what is the status of virtio-wayland
I can say that by following the instructions in
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/crosvm/, I was able to
get a simple SHM client presented in the host (with gnome-shell).
But I had to change the SHM allocation to call VIRTWL_IOCTL_NEW_ALLOC
instead of shm_open or its equivalent.
Zach (on CC) will be able to give a more informed answer.
and how does this
discussion relate to virtio-wayland?
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/crosvm/+/master/devices/src/virtio/wl.rs
I'm working on getting the equivalent functionality into mainline.
Why not mainline virtio-wayland?
Because I can see no reason to have Wayland-specific code in the kernel.
Everything that virtio-wayland does is needed by other presentation
protocols such as X.
We could have virtio-graphics-presentation I guess, but virtio-gpu
already deals with sharing graphics buffers between guest and host, so
we would be duplicating concerns.
Regards,
Tomeu
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
