Jani Nikula wrote: > On Sun, 19 Nov 2017, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 01:44:06PM +0100, Rainer Fiebig wrote: >>> Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 12:56:26PM +0100, Rainer Fiebig wrote: >>>>> Greg KH wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 05:08:20PM +0100, Rainer Fiebig wrote: >>>>>>> Greg KH wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 01:47:32PM +0100, Rainer Fiebig wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hopefully the right addressee. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Encountered two bad backports which cause screen-flicker. >>>>>>>>> dmesg shows: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> [drm:ironlake_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO underrun >>>>>>>>> [drm:ironlake_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* PCH transcoder A FIFO underrun >>>>>>>>> [drm:ironlake_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe B FIFO underrun >>>>>>>>> [drm:ironlake_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* PCH transcoder B FIFO underrun >>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> CPU: Intel Core i3 (Clarkdale/Ironlake) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The backports are: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> - diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >>>>>>>>> index 49de476..277a802 100644 >>>>>>>>> - diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >>>>>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >>>>>>>>> index a19ec06..3ce9ba3 100644 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> After reversing them the flicker is gone, no more messages in dmesg. All >>>>>>>>> else OK so far. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So which commit was the one that caused the problem? I will be glad to >>>>>>>> revert it. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> greg k-h >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I started by reverting the more complex one first ("index >>>>>>> 49de476..277a802100644"). But the kernel wouldn't compile then. >>>>>> >>>>>> What git commit id is that? I don't see those ids in the 4.9-stable >>>>>> tree. >>>>>> >>>>>>> So I also reverted "index a19ec06..3ce9ba3 100644". After that the >>>>>>> kernel compiled just fine and the problems were gone (still are). >>>>>> >>>>>> Same here, what git commit id was this? >>>>>> >>>>>> thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> greg k-h >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OK, no mistake. IIRC, I took the patches (and the IDs) from the >>>>> changelog for patch-4.9.62. I've attached both, so you can check yourself. >>>>> >>>>> I've also applied a freshly downloaded patch-4.9.62 to a freshly >>>>> expanded 4.9 and re-compiled. The flicker is there. I haven't yet >>>>> reverted the two patches but I'm confident that after having done so the >>>>> flicker will be gone. If not I'll let you know. >>>>> >>>>> As a good news: 4.14 is *not* affected. So to me it seems those two >>>>> patches are part of sort of a package and can not be backported alone. >>>>> >>>>> So long! >>>>> Rainer Fiebig >>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >>>>> index 49de476..277a802 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c >>>>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ >>>>> >>>>> #include <linux/cpufreq.h> >>>>> #include <drm/drm_plane_helper.h> >>>>> +#include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> >>>>> #include "i915_drv.h" >>>>> #include "intel_drv.h" >>>>> #include "../../../platform/x86/intel_ips.h" >>>>> @@ -2017,9 +2018,9 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_level(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, >>>>> const struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, >>>>> int level, >>>>> struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, >>>>> - struct intel_plane_state *pristate, >>>>> - struct intel_plane_state *sprstate, >>>>> - struct intel_plane_state *curstate, >>>>> + const struct intel_plane_state *pristate, >>>>> + const struct intel_plane_state *sprstate, >>>>> + const struct intel_plane_state *curstate, >>>>> struct intel_wm_level *result) >>>>> { >>>>> uint16_t pri_latency = dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[level]; >>>>> @@ -2341,28 +2342,24 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) >>>>> struct intel_pipe_wm *pipe_wm; >>>>> struct drm_device *dev = state->dev; >>>>> const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); >>>>> - struct intel_plane *intel_plane; >>>>> - struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL; >>>>> - struct intel_plane_state *sprstate = NULL; >>>>> - struct intel_plane_state *curstate = NULL; >>>>> + struct drm_plane *plane; >>>>> + const struct drm_plane_state *plane_state; >>>>> + const struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL; >>>>> + const struct intel_plane_state *sprstate = NULL; >>>>> + const struct intel_plane_state *curstate = NULL; >>>>> int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev), usable_level; >>>>> struct ilk_wm_maximums max; >>>>> >>>>> pipe_wm = &cstate->wm.ilk.optimal; >>>>> >>>>> - for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, intel_crtc, intel_plane) { >>>>> - struct intel_plane_state *ps; >>>>> + drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, plane_state, &cstate->base) { >>>>> + const struct intel_plane_state *ps = to_intel_plane_state(plane_state); >>>>> >>>>> - ps = intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(state, >>>>> - intel_plane); >>>>> - if (!ps) >>>>> - continue; >>>>> - >>>>> - if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY) >>>>> + if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY) >>>>> pristate = ps; >>>>> - else if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY) >>>>> + else if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY) >>>>> sprstate = ps; >>>>> - else if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR) >>>>> + else if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR) >>>>> curstate = ps; >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> @@ -2384,11 +2381,9 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) >>>>> if (pipe_wm->sprites_scaled) >>>>> usable_level = 0; >>>>> >>>>> - ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, 0, cstate, >>>>> - pristate, sprstate, curstate, &pipe_wm->raw_wm[0]); >>>>> - >>>>> memset(&pipe_wm->wm, 0, sizeof(pipe_wm->wm)); >>>>> - pipe_wm->wm[0] = pipe_wm->raw_wm[0]; >>>>> + ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, 0, cstate, >>>>> + pristate, sprstate, curstate, &pipe_wm->wm[0]); >>>>> >>>>> if (IS_HASWELL(dev) || IS_BROADWELL(dev)) >>>>> pipe_wm->linetime = hsw_compute_linetime_wm(cstate); >>>>> @@ -2398,8 +2393,8 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) >>>>> >>>>> ilk_compute_wm_reg_maximums(dev, 1, &max); >>>>> >>>>> - for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) { >>>>> - struct intel_wm_level *wm = &pipe_wm->raw_wm[level]; >>>>> + for (level = 1; level <= usable_level; level++) { >>>>> + struct intel_wm_level *wm = &pipe_wm->wm[level]; >>>>> >>>>> ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, level, cstate, >>>>> pristate, sprstate, curstate, wm); >>>>> @@ -2409,13 +2404,10 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) >>>>> * register maximums since such watermarks are >>>>> * always invalid. >>>>> */ >>>>> - if (level > usable_level) >>>>> - continue; >>>>> - >>>>> - if (ilk_validate_wm_level(level, &max, wm)) >>>>> - pipe_wm->wm[level] = *wm; >>>>> - else >>>>> - usable_level = level; >>>>> + if (!ilk_validate_wm_level(level, &max, wm)) { >>>>> + memset(wm, 0, sizeof(*wm)); >>>>> + break; >>>>> + } >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> return 0; >>>> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >>>>> index a19ec06..3ce9ba3 100644 >>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >>>>> @@ -457,7 +457,6 @@ struct intel_crtc_scaler_state { >>>>> >>>>> struct intel_pipe_wm { >>>>> struct intel_wm_level wm[5]; >>>>> - struct intel_wm_level raw_wm[5]; >>>>> uint32_t linetime; >>>>> bool fbc_wm_enabled; >>>>> bool pipe_enabled; >>>> >>>> Ok, so this looks like commit 8777b927b92cf5b6c29f9f9d3c737addea9ac8a7 >>>> upstream which is commit 7de694782cbe7840f2c0de6f1e70f41fc1b8b6e8 in >>>> 4.9.62. >>>> >>>> I've cc:ed the authors of that patch now. >>>> >>>> Maarten, any hints? Should I revert this from 4.9-stable, or was there >>>> a follow-on patch that resolved this issue in mainline? >>>> >>>> thanks, >>>> >>>> greg k-h >>>> >>> >>> OK, after reverting the patches, the flicker *is* gone. >> >> Thanks for confirming this. >> >>> BTW (for the future): Was it the right way to address >>> stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx in this matter or would the bugreport at >>> freedesktop.org have been enough? I'm a bit unsure about that. >> >> I have no idea what the i915 developers want, but as far as I'm >> concerned, sending this to stable@vger was fine with me, I have no >> problem doing a bit of work in tracking down the specific patch before >> bugging the developers involved. > > Well, this one we wanted to be backported, and so indicated with cc: > stable, but apparently it went south anyway. :( > > Rainer, does v4.14 work for you? I.e. is the commit okay or not before > the backport? > > Maarten? > > BR, > Jani. > > 4.14 is OK, no problems. So long! Rainer Fiebig _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel