On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 10:03:34PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In order to silent sparse in dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(), we need to mark
s/silent/silence/
On the series (assuming sparse is indeed happy now, I didn't check that):
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> the incoming fence object as being RCU protected and not the pointer to
> the object.
>
> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jason Ekstrand <jason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> index efdabbb64e3c..4c008170fe65 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static inline struct dma_fence *dma_fence_get_rcu(struct dma_fence *fence)
> * The caller is required to hold the RCU read lock.
> */
> static inline struct dma_fence *
> -dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(struct dma_fence * __rcu *fencep)
> +dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(struct dma_fence __rcu **fencep)
> {
> do {
> struct dma_fence *fence;
> --
> 2.13.6
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
