On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 01:07:57PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >>> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to > >>> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() > >>> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. > >> > >> Reviewed and applied to drm-misc-next. Thanks! > > > > Thanks! > > > > I happened to notice that this was in next-20171102, but missing in > > next-20171103. Did it get removed, or am I misunderstanding something? > > I don't know. It's in drm-misc-next, though, so it'll flow upstream > without my intervention. I'll make 4.16. Again, our merge cutoff is -rc6, hence why they all missed. I guess one more to cherry-pick for you, or time to give up? -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
