[PATCH] drm/TODO: Clarify DRM_DEV_* conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Not everyone agrees this is the best thing, so make it really clear
that maintainers need to be asked first, then the conversion. We've
had a few newbies that did this the other way round, got their patches
rejected, which isn't the best newbie experience.

Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
index 96f8ec7dbe4e..e9840d693a86 100644
--- a/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
+++ b/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst
@@ -179,6 +179,10 @@ don't do this, drivers used dev_info/warn/err to make this differentiation. We
 now have DRM_DEV_* variants of the drm print macros, so we can start to convert
 those drivers back to using drm-formwatted specific log messages.
 
+Before you start this conversion please contact the relevant maintainers to make
+sure your work will be merged - not everyone agrees that the DRM dmesg macros
+are better.
+
 Contact: Sean Paul, Maintainer of the driver you plan to convert
 
 Core refactorings
-- 
2.15.0.rc1

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux