On 10/25/2017 1:13 AM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 10/24/2017 12:06 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 24/10/17 06:00 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 10/24/2017 11:43 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 24/10/17 04:58 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 10/24/2017 10:36 AM, S, Shirish wrote:
On 10/24/2017 7:48 PM, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 10/24/2017 09:51 AM, S, Shirish wrote:
From: Shirish S <shirish.s@xxxxxxx>
On some systems amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset seems to be
called before the BO is pinned, leading to page faults
as the GPU address is still subject to change.
This patch fixes the above issue.
Signed-off-by: Shirish S <shirish.s@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
index 974ee97..b251b7e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
@@ -1786,8 +1786,11 @@ static int get_fb_info(const struct
amdgpu_framebuffer *amdgpu_fb,
return r;
}
- if (fb_location)
- *fb_location = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(rbo);
+ r = amdgpu_bo_pin(rbo, AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM, fb_location);
+ if (unlikely(r != 0)) {
+ amdgpu_bo_unreserve(rbo);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
Where the unpin would happen then ? Today DAL calls pin from
dm_plane_helper_prepare_fb while the unpin from
dm_plane_helper_cleanup_fb.
Good point, am trying to address the issue Michel is facing, if this
patch works, we can think of unpinning the bo appropriately.
Ideally it should be at the end of amdgpu_dm_atomic_check(). Can you
think of any better place?
Sounds right, you have to unpin within atomic_check since UMD
might call
check without commit sometimes.
Not sure it's appropriate to pin BOs from atomic_check.
In general, BOs should be pinned just before the display hardware
starts
accessing them, and unpinned just after it stops accessing them.
Not sure what other option (unless moving fill_plane_attributes_from_fb
to commit)
If that is possible, it sounds like the proper solution.
since new fb parameters are needed in check to build the new plane
state.
Is the BO's MC address needed for the new plane state though?
Yea, in general it seems tiling flags and address stuff can be
deferred to
commit since they are really only needed for actual programming
and by this skipping the need to call get_fb_info during check.
The only problem is no sanity can be done on them in that case.
Andrey,
Till now the get_fb_info() never calculated fb_location(as addrReq was
always false), but since now its required to program the high part of
the address structure,
can you move it back into the commit scope and ensure that fb_location
is calculated everytime.(I have limited knowledge behind why it was
moved out)
And in case if you insist on adding pin & unpin in atomic_check() scope
i can post a patch for it.
Regards,
Shirish S
Thanks,
Andrey
Before we did upstream refactoring get_fb_info was always called called
from atomic_commit so it was within pin/unpin scope. Moving it out into
check we missed the problem Shirish just found.
Actually, I found it. :)
We can't do pin in beginning of check and unpin in the end of commit
because as i said, sometimes check is called w\o commit, [...]
That also means pinning and unpinning within check isn't a good
solution, since pinning might involve moving the buffer, which could be
a waste of effort if the commit never follows.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
