Hi Marco,
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 15:05 -0300, Marco Franchi wrote:
> Improve the binding example by removing the '@di0' notation, which
> fixes the following build warning:
>
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /display@di0 has a unit name, but
> no reg property
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Franchi <marco.franchi@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl-imx-drm.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl-imx-
> drm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl-imx-
> drm.txt
> index f798547..44814f0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl-imx-drm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl-imx-drm.txt
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ Optional properties:
>
> example:
>
> -display@di0 {
> +display-di0 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx-parallel-display";
> edid = [edid-data];
> interface-pix-fmt = "rgb24";
Thank you for the patch. We certainly should get rid of the @di0
notation. Since these nodes mostly describe the DISP0 and DISP1 pin
groups controlled by the IOMUXC, I'd prefer to rename this to
-display@di0 {
+disp0 {
instead, if that is fine with you.
I'd also like to move the disp0/disp1 nodes into the SoC dtsi files to
avoid having to duplicate port@0 all over the place.
regards
Philipp
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
