On 2017年09月26日 13:12, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 09:02:22AM +0800, Mark yao wrote:
On 2017年09月21日 06:29, Thomas Meyer wrote:
Use vma_pages function on vma object instead of explicit computation.
Found by coccinelle spatch "api/vma_pages.cocci"
Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@xxxxxxxx>
---
Looks good for me:
Acked-by: Mark Yao <mark.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Once more a maintainer who acks a patch and doesn't push it. This is
really confusing, who exactly do you expect to handle this patch for you?
Please push to drm-misc-next (also for future patches), thanks.
-Daniel
Hi Daniel
I Saw the patch title is "[PATCH 7/7]", I guessed it's one of a series of patches and maybe it can pushed by series.
Ok, Pushed it to drm-misc-next.
diff -u -p a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_gem.c
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_gem.c
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static int rockchip_drm_gem_object_mmap_
{
struct rockchip_gem_object *rk_obj = to_rockchip_obj(obj);
unsigned int i, count = obj->size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- unsigned long user_count = (vma->vm_end - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ unsigned long user_count = vma_pages(vma);
unsigned long uaddr = vma->vm_start;
unsigned long offset = vma->vm_pgoff;
unsigned long end = user_count + offset;
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
--
Ｍark Yao
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Ｍark Ya
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
