On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 20:41, Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, of course, but I was referring to the values which could be returned through the i2c-algo-bit call used in this edid detection call.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:07:51 -0200, Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Oh, there's -ENOMEM, -EINVAL and probably a few others down in the
> From what I've checked, the other return error value in this context could
> be -EREMOTEIO, which could be caused by transmission error so it should be
> retried.
bowels of the kernel i2c bits. Starting with the obvious (ENXIO) seems
safest to me.
Yes, of course, but I was referring to the values which could be returned through the i2c-algo-bit call used in this edid detection call.
--
Eugeni Dodonov
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
