On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 06:08 PM, John Keeping wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 01:27:40PM -0700, Sean Paul wrote:
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:19:01AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
Hi Sean,
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:00:25AM -0700, Sean Paul wrote:
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 05:05:33PM +0800, Nickey Yang wrote:
This patch correct Feedback divider setting:
1、Set Feedback divider [8:5] when HIGH_PROGRAM_EN
2、Due to the use of a "by 2 pre-scaler," the range of the
feedback multiplication Feedback divider is limited to even
division numbers, and Feedback divider must be greater than
12, less than 1000.
3、Make the previously configured Feedback divider(LSB)
factors effective
Signed-off-by: Nickey Yang <nickey.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
index 9a20b9d..52698b7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
#define LOW_PROGRAM_EN 0
#define HIGH_PROGRAM_EN BIT(7)
#define LOOP_DIV_LOW_SEL(val) (((val) - 1) & 0x1f)
-#define LOOP_DIV_HIGH_SEL(val) ((((val) - 1) >> 5) & 0x1f)
+#define LOOP_DIV_HIGH_SEL(val) ((((val) - 1) >> 5) & 0xf)
#define PLL_LOOP_DIV_EN BIT(5)
#define PLL_INPUT_DIV_EN BIT(4)
@@ -461,6 +461,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_phy_init(struct dw_mipi_dsi *dsi)
dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x17, INPUT_DIVIDER(dsi->input_div));
dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x18, LOOP_DIV_LOW_SEL(dsi->feedback_div) |
LOW_PROGRAM_EN);
+ dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x19, PLL_LOOP_DIV_EN | PLL_INPUT_DIV_EN);
You do the same write 2 lines down. Are both needed? It would be nice if the
register names were also defined, so this is easier to read.
If I'm reading correctly, I think this is what Nickey meant by:
"3、Make the previously configured Feedback divider(LSB)
factors effective"
. My reading of the databook is that this step finalizes the previous
two writes (to test code 0x17 and 0x18).
Given this was buggy (?) previously, it does seem like having some extra
language to document this could help. Register names (or "test codes",
per the docs?) could help, but additionally, maybe a few more comments.
Ah, yeah, thanks for the explanation. It's not clear that this latches the
values above. I think register names and comments would be immensely helpful.
According to the databook, 0x19 controls whether the loop/input dividers
are derived from the hsfreqrange configuration or use the values in 0x17
and 0x18. I can't see why writing the same value to this register
multiple times is necessary.
According to databook, set 0x19 to 0x30 make the previously configured
N(0x17) and M(0x18)
factors effective, 0x18 need to be setted by twice, since we need to set
0x18 LSB and MSB separately,
As we test, after set 0x18 LSB, if we do not set 0x19 immediately to
make the configrued effective,
when we set 0x18 MSB, the 0x18 LSB value will gone, and we will get
wrong pll frequency. Anyway,
I think should add some comment here to clear that.
dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x18, LOOP_DIV_HIGH_SEL(dsi->feedback_div) |
HIGH_PROGRAM_EN);
dw_mipi_dsi_phy_write(dsi, 0x19, PLL_LOOP_DIV_EN | PLL_INPUT_DIV_EN);
[...]
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
