On 9/19/2017 1:07 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> Document the cec clock binding. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt index 06668bca7ffc..4497ae054d49 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/adi,adv7511.txt @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ Optional properties: - adi,disable-timing-generator: Only for ADV7533. Disables the internal timing generator. The chip will rely on the sync signals in the DSI data lanes, rather than generate its own timings for HDMI output. +- clocks: from common clock binding: handle to CEC clock.It's called "phandle" in the DT speak. :-) Are you sure the clock specifier would always be absent?Sorry? I don't understand the question. Did you mean: "can be absent?"?No, you only say that there'll be the clock phandle only. The clock specifier may follow the phandle for the clock devices that have "#clock-cells" prop != 0.I have to say that I just copy-and-pasted this from other bindings.
:-)
Would this be better? - clocks: list of clock specifiers, corresponding to entries in the clock-names property;
Didn't you say that there'll be only one clock, "cec"? If so, there's gonna be a single clock phandle+specifier pair. They always go in pairs. :-)
- clock-names: from common clock binding: must be "cec". Regards, Hans
MBR, Sergei _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
