Hi Krzysztof,
On 2017-09-11 15:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Maciej Purski <m.purski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+ ctx->client[I2C_MHL] = client;
+
+ ctx->client[I2C_TPI] = i2c_new_dummy(adapter, I2C_TPI_ADDR);
+ if (!ctx->client[I2C_TPI]) {
+ dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to create TPI client\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ ctx->client[I2C_HDMI] = i2c_new_dummy(adapter, I2C_HDMI_ADDR);
+ if (!ctx->client[I2C_HDMI]) {
+ dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to create HDMI RX client\n");
+ goto fail_tpi;
+ }
+
+ ctx->client[I2C_CBUS] = i2c_new_dummy(adapter, I2C_CBUS_ADDR);
+ if (!ctx->client[I2C_CBUS]) {
+ dev_err(ctx->dev, "failed to create CBUS client\n");
+ goto fail_hdmi;
+ }
You are using i2c_smbus_* calls. Why not converting to regmap_i2c? It is
preferred interface.
According to my search, there are only 5 drivers, which use regmap_i2c and
none of them in drm. If you think that it is really needed, could you please
explain
why?
There are slightly more than five drivers:
$ git grep regmap_init_i2c | wc -l
352
... and even more using regmap interface in generic (not i2c).
I think this is really wanted because for free you get:
1. locking,
2. proper locking - with lockdep and nested mutexes :),
3. caching of accesses,
4. handling of endianness,
5. optionally a trivial way of handling interrupts (regmap_irq_chip),
Also this brings unified interface for most of the drivers regardless
of protocol used beneath (I2C, SPI and even MMIO but for simple cases
MMIO might not have much sense). This last argument actually brings
the most benefit for me because it abstracts driver from trivial I2C
implementation and it could allow even easy code-reuse for e.g. SPI
version.
Regmap make sense for multi-function chips, which require more than one
client driver (so proper locking is important). It also makes sense if
the chip is produced in more than one flavor (like i2c, spi, MMIO, etc).
None of the above takes place in this case... So in case of this driver
using regmap is IMHO an over-engineering.
> ...
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
