On 01.09.2017 09:06, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Andrzej, > > On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:28:13 +0200 > Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 31.08.2017 17:55, Boris Brezillon wrote: >>> Document the bindings used for the Cadence DSI bridge. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Changes in v3: >>> - Fix clock names in the example >>> - Document how to represent DSI devices that are controller through >>> an external bus like I2C or SPI >>> >>> Changes in v2: >>> - None >>> --- >>> .../bindings/display/bridge/cdns,dsi.txt | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,dsi.txt >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,dsi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,dsi.txt >>> new file mode 100644 >>> index 000000000000..c70008bd8c0d >>> --- /dev/null >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/cdns,dsi.txt >>> @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ >>> +Cadence DSI bridge >>> +================== >>> + >>> +The Cadence DSI bridge is a DPI to DSI bridge supporting up to 4 DSI lanes. >>> + >>> +Required properties: >>> +- compatible: should be set to "cdns,dsi-1.3.1". >>> +- reg: physical base address and length of the controller's registers. >>> +- interrupts: interrupt line connected to the DSI bridge. >>> +- clocks: DSI bridge clocks. >>> +- clock-names: must contain "pclk" and "sysclk". >>> +- phys: phandle link to the MIPI D-PHY controller. >>> +- phy-names: must contain "dphy". >>> +- #address-cells: must be set to 1. >>> +- #size-cells: must be set to 0. >>> + >>> +Required subnodes: >>> +- ports: Ports as described in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/graph.txt. >>> + 2 ports are available: >>> + * port 0: this port is only needed if some of your DSI devices are >>> + controlled through an external bus like I2C or SPI. Can have at >>> + most 4 endpoints. The endpoint number is directly encoding the >>> + DSI virtual channel used by this device. >>> + * port 1: represents the DPI input. >>> + Other ports will be added later to support the new kind of inputs. >> I think usual practice is to use lower numbers for input ports, higher >> for output ports. >> Is there a reason to do it this way? > The main reason I did that is because we only have one output port and > can have 1, 2 or 3 input ports: one is the DPI and the 2 others are > called SDI (some kind of serial input). I thought it would be better to > have all inputs using contiguous port numbers, and if we put inputs > first that means having a hole between the input and output port (port 0 > would be the DPI input and port 3 the DSI output). > > Honestly, that's just a detail, so if you prefer to have the input > ports start at 0 I'm fine with that. No serious preferences, just curiosity. In fact port numbering schema is private thing of the device node. Regards Andrzej > > Regards, > > Boris > > > > > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
