Re: drm: Why shmem?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Noralf Trønnes <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Currently I'm using the cma library with tinydrm because it was so
> simple to use even though I have to work around the fact that reads are
> uncached. A bigger problem that I have become aware of, is that it
> restricts the dma buffers it can import since they have to be continous.
>
> So I looked to udl and it uses shmem. Fine, let's make a shmem gem
> library similar to the cma library.
>
> Now I have done so and have started to think about the DOC: section,
> explaining what the library does. And I'm stuck, what's the benefit of
> using shmem compared to just using alloc_page()?

Using shmem means that, when the buffer isn't pinned for DMA usage by
the device, the pages can be swapped out.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux