On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Felix Kuehling <felix.kuehling@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I must have added that accidentally when cherry-picking an internal
> patch for upstreaming. Thanks for catching it.
>
> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>
Applied. thanks!
Alex
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
>
> On 2017-08-23 09:17 AM, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Remove a redundant identical return statement, it has no use.
>>
>> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1454586 ("Structurally dead code")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
>> index fb6e5dbd5a03..309f2419c6d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_v8.c
>> @@ -155,7 +155,6 @@ static const struct kfd2kgd_calls kfd2kgd = {
>> struct kfd2kgd_calls *amdgpu_amdkfd_gfx_8_0_get_functions(void)
>> {
>> return (struct kfd2kgd_calls *)&kfd2kgd;
>> - return (struct kfd2kgd_calls *)&kfd2kgd;
>> }
>>
>> static inline struct amdgpu_device *get_amdgpu_device(struct kgd_dev *kgd)
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
