On 17/08/17 13:21, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 17 August 2017 at 11:37, Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The check to see if mstm->msto is null is redundant because it is
>> an array and hence can never be null. Remove the redundant check.
>>
>> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1375915 ("Array compared against 0")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c
>> index f7b4326a4641..51e9081b95a0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_display.c
>> @@ -3141,7 +3141,7 @@ nv50_mstc_new(struct nv50_mstm *mstm, struct drm_dp_mst_port *port,
>> mstc->connector.funcs->reset(&mstc->connector);
>> nouveau_conn_attach_properties(&mstc->connector);
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mstm->msto) && mstm->msto; i++)
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mstm->msto); i++)
> I think that should be mstm->msto[i]. After all we are dereferencing
> the pointer, so we don't want to crash.
Yes, that makes far more sense. I'll send a V2. Thanks Emil.
>
>> drm_mode_connector_attach_encoder(&mstc->connector, &mstm->msto[i]->encoder);
>
> -Emil
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
