Re: [PATCH v3 01/22] drm: Add GEM backed framebuffer library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Den 16.08.2017 23.08, skrev Laurent Pinchart:
Hi Noralf,

On Wednesday 16 Aug 2017 23:03:36 Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Den 16.08.2017 22.39, skrev Laurent Pinchart:
On Wednesday 16 Aug 2017 21:52:02 Noralf Trønnes wrote:
Den 16.08.2017 19.24, skrev Eric Anholt:
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
This library provides helpers for drivers that don't subclass
drm_framebuffer and are backed by drm_gem_object. The code is
taken from drm_fb_cma_helper.

Signed-off-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
---
+/**
+ * drm_gem_fb_destroy - Free GEM backed framebuffer
+ * @fb: DRM framebuffer
+ *
+ * Frees a GEM backed framebuffer with it's backing buffer(s) and the
structure
grammar nit: "its"

Other than that,

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, applied to drm-misc.
The patches were posted on Sunday. If you don't give at least a week to
reviewers, I don't think they will keep bothering. I certainly won't.
Hi Laurent,

I actually didn't think there was much interest in this patchset since
the first version of the patcheset was sent 31/7. Daniel gave me his rb
if I fixed the docs a week ago. Instead of applying it directly I sent
a new version to give Eric a chance to look at it since he showed
interest in an rfc. So when I got his rb, I just applied.

All that being said, I do appreciate reviews since that improves the work.
I will adapt to waiting a week if that's what's expected.
There are always exceptions, or at least borderline cases, but I think that
one week is a reasonable delay in the general case. If you're at v8 and your
series has been acked by 10 people already it can be a different story. Or if
you're fixing a security issue that has to get in a late -rc before the final
kernel is released. Or lots of other cases probably.

Sorry about the let down.
It's OK, I know it wasn't on purpose :-) Your reply is definitely appreciated.

Could you post a follow-up patch to fix the few issues I mentioned (at least
the ones you agree with of course) ?


Yes, I'll do that.

I suck at writing documentation, so when I need documentation for say
an argument, I copy it from another function with the same argument.
Not always pretty obviously, so I rely on help from reviewers to ensure
proper english. Daniel has helped me many times to flesh out the docs.

Noralf.

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux