Re: [PATCH 00/14] mgag200 fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18/07/2017 10:43 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hi,

this is a summer cleanup sale, a patchset containing various fixes for
mgag200 driver taken from openSUSE / SUSE kernels.  They have been in
our kernels for ages, so at least they are supposed to be stable.

Most of patches came from Egbert, and one PM patch from me that is a
resubmission of the once-post-and-lost patch.


thanks,

Takashi

===

Egbert Eich (13):
   drm/mgag200: Add doublescan and interlace support
   drm/mgag200: Add additional limits for certain G200 variants
   drm/mgag200: Fix memleak in error path in mgag200_bo_create()
   drm/mgag200: Free container instead of member in
     mga_user_framebuffer_destroy()
   drm/mgag200: Initialize data needed to map fbdev memory
   drm/mgag200: Simplify function mgag200_ttm_placement()
   drm/mgag200: Add support for MATROX PCI device IDs 0x520 and 0x521
   drm/mgag200: Cleanup cursor BOs properly
   drm/mgag200: Add missing drm_connector_unregister()
   drm/mgag200: Don't use crtc_* parameters for validation
   drm/mgag200: Consolidate depth/bpp handling
   drm/mgag200: Add command line option to specify preferred depth
   drm/mgag200: Add mode validation debugging code

Takashi Iwai (1):
   drm/mgag200: Implement basic PM support

  drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.c  |  54 +++++++++++
  drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.h  |  22 +++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_fb.c   |  14 +--
  drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_main.c | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
  drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 166 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
  drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_ttm.c  |  11 ++-
  6 files changed, 357 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)


Patches were tested against G200eW3, G200e4 & G200eH3 and it's working fine and we haven't seen any issues.

There's one thing though, the patch "[PATCH 01/14] drm/mgag200: Add doublescan and interlace support" may cause problems as doublescan and interlace aren't tested and aren't officially supported on the G200 server line products. So, I'm wondering if it shouldn't be kept disabled for them.

--
Mathieu Larouche Ing./Eng.
Software Designer
Matrox Graphics Inc.
Phone : 514 822-6000 x7905
Email : mathieu.larouche@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux