Re: KMS and TTM questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/03/2011 09:14 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
the front buffer. The problem was the buffer offset for the second
allocation was the same as the VQ buffer. I'm stump to what I'm doing
wrong, so does anyone have a idea?
I gave up trying to understand TTM (they don't make happy pills that big)
and used GEM and a simple allocator. The private allocator GEM change
means you can now use GEM to magic up objects that are in on card or
stolen memory where applicable not just backed in system memory.

IMHO people making that comment just don't understand the problems TTM is trying to solve, but it usually dawns on them when they have worked on their own specialized solution for a year or so...

/Thomas



_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux