Hi Chris, 2017-07-28 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Up until recently sync_file were create to export a single dma-fence to > userspace, and so we could canabalise a bit insie dma-fence to mark > whether or not we had enable polling for the sync_file itself. However, > with the advent of syncobj, we do allow userspace to create multiple > sync_files for a single dma-fence. (Similarly, that the sw-sync > validation framework also started returning multiple sync-files wrapping > a single dma-fence for a syncpt also triggering the problem.) > > This patch reverts my suggestion in commit e24165537312 > ("dma-buf/sync_file: only enable fence signalling on poll()") to use a > single bit in the shared dma-fence and restores the sync_file->flags for > tracking the bits individually. > > Reported-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Fixes: f1e8c67123cf ("dma-buf/sw-sync: Use an rbtree to sort fences in the timeline") > Fixes: e9083420bbac ("drm: introduce sync objects (v4)") > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: <drm-intel-fixes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.13-rc1+ > --- > drivers/dma-buf/sync_file.c | 5 +++-- > include/linux/sync_file.h | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) I confirm the patch fixes the sync kselftests for me. Pushed to drm-misc-next. Gustavo _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel