Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Lyude <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 15:10 +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 04:00:40PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > In case of an unknown broadcast message is sent mstb will remain
> > unset,
> > so check for this.
> >
> > CC: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Could someone review 2/3 and 3/3 in this patchset? 1/3 was NAK'd and
> otherwise isn't needed anymore.
>
> Thanks,
> Imre
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > index 12c0ab3..412b9ca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > @@ -2334,7 +2334,9 @@ static int drm_dp_mst_handle_up_req(struct
> > drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr)
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Got RSN: pn: %d avail_pbn
> > %d\n", msg.u.resource_stat.port_number,
> > msg.u.resource_stat.available_pbn);
> > }
> >
> > - drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device(mstb);
> > + if (mstb)
> > + drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device(mstb);
> > +
> > memset(&mgr->up_req_recv, 0, sizeof(struct
> > drm_dp_sideband_msg_rx));
> > }
> > return ret;
> > --
> > 2.5.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
