On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:02:42 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Use pp_control instead of re-reading? Could, but you'll note a later patch eliminates both pp_status and pp_control local variables, so I didn't bother to clean this up when refactoring. > dp_aux_ch does the low-level io for the below, so either this one or the > below three hunks look a bit redundant. Yeah, probably not necessary. I just added checks everywhere I could think of to try and figure out where power was not being applied when needed. Should I bother to include this patch in the series at all? It's purely for diagnostics to make sure the panel is powered during all aux channel transactions. -- keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpGZ1tO7CKFJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
