On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:09:36PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > We're going to assume that EDID is more reliable than the VBT tables > for eDP panels, which is notably true on MacBook machines where the > VBT contains completely bogus data. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> Ok, this is way over my head, just checked whether the patch does what it claims to - nice exercise in reading dp modeset code ;-) Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@xxxxxxxx Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
