On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 11:22:43AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I was mostly thinking of the 'seq = query(); wait(seq + n);' pattern > > where we can avoid doing the full update more than once if we enable > > the interrupt already during the query. > > Don't we still wait 5 seconds before disabling vblank? In that case, the > chances of hitting an idle vblank are pretty slim if the application is > actually busy. With the disable_immediate thing we only wait until the next vblank before disabling the irq again. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
