On 07/05/2017 04:42 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 5 July 2017 at 10:14, Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/05/2017 02:35 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
2017년 07월 05일 18:00에 Archit Taneja 이(가) 쓴 글:
On 07/03/2017 02:12 PM, Inki Dae wrote:
This patch removes unnecessary checking of return value.
Ps. this patch depends on below one,
http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg145687.html
Will this one^ go via the exynos pull req or drm-misc? If there won't
be any conflicts, we could get both the patches through drm-misc to
keep things simple.
exynos pull it would be better. I will pick this up. :)
If patch # 1/14 goes through drm-misc, and the exynos patch goes through
exynos pull, the drm-misc branch would break. That's the reason I
preferred the exynos patches to go via misc.
As mentioned in 1/14:
If 1/14 is applied before the rest of the series all the drivers
(addressed with 2-14) will fail to build.
I think...
Yeah, they would. We'd want to push 1/14 right at the end. Getting all
the ones from 2-14 via drm-misc would make life simpler.
Archit
-Emil
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
