On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 12:30:48PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > I've pretty much decided that I'll be happy if I can solve this for > future kernels. If someone else wants to try and cook up some kind > of simple regression fix I don't have any real objections. Imo fixing the regression isn't the job of the display side, since display isn't the one that broke the reset contract. Well apart from not syncing with pending non-blocking atomic modeset commits, which we could fix easily by dropping DRIVER_ATOMIC from gen2-4. But I'm still trying to figure out why Chris thinks this isn't a gem regression ... -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
