On Mon, Jul 03, 2017 at 05:55:43PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote:
> CEA-861-F introduces extended tag codes for EDID extension blocks,
> which indicates the actual type of the data block. The code for
> using exteded tag is 0x7, whereas in the existing code, the
> corresponding macro is named as "VIDEO_CAPABILITY_BLOCK"
>
> This patch renames the macro and usages from "VIDEO_CAPABILITY_BLOCK"
> to "CEA_EXTENDED_TAG"
>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 2e55599..c81b076 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -2566,7 +2566,7 @@ add_detailed_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid,
> #define VIDEO_BLOCK 0x02
> #define VENDOR_BLOCK 0x03
> #define SPEAKER_BLOCK 0x04
> -#define VIDEO_CAPABILITY_BLOCK 0x07
> +#define CEA_EXTENDED_TAG 0x07
> #define EDID_BASIC_AUDIO (1 << 6)
> #define EDID_CEA_YCRCB444 (1 << 5)
> #define EDID_CEA_YCRCB422 (1 << 4)
> @@ -3793,7 +3793,7 @@ bool drm_rgb_quant_range_selectable(struct edid *edid)
> return false;
>
> for_each_cea_db(edid_ext, i, start, end) {
> - if (cea_db_tag(&edid_ext[i]) == VIDEO_CAPABILITY_BLOCK &&
> + if (cea_db_tag(&edid_ext[i]) == CEA_EXTENDED_TAG &&
> cea_db_payload_len(&edid_ext[i]) == 2) {
The video capability block should have a specific ext tag no? We should
check for that.
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("CEA VCDB 0x%02x\n", edid_ext[i + 2]);
> return edid_ext[i + 2] & EDID_CEA_VCDB_QS;
> --
> 2.7.4
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
