On 06/24/2017 03:20 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 13:47:43 +0530
Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/22/2017 01:20 PM, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
2017-06-20 19:31 GMT+02:00 Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 06/16/2017 08:13 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On 06/16/2017 02:11 AM, Eric Anholt wrote:
If the panel-bridge is being set up after the drm_mode_config_reset(),
then the connector's state would never get initialized, and we'd
dereference the NULL in the hotplug path. We also need to register
the connector, so that userspace can get at it.
Shouldn't the KMS driver make sure the panel-bridge is set up before
drm_mode_config_reset? Is it the case when we're inserting the
panel-bridge driver as a module?
All the connectors that have been added are registered automatically
when drm_dev_register() is called by the KMS driver. Registering a
connector in the middle of setting up our driver is prone to race
conditions if the userspace decides to use them immediately.
Yeah, this is fixing initializing panel_bridge at DSI host_attach time,
which in the case of a panel module that creates the DSI device
(adv7533-style, like you said I should use as a reference) will be after
drm_mode_config_reset() and drm_dev_register().
Okay. In the case of the msm kms driver, we defer probe until the
adv7533 module is inserted, only then we proceed to drm_mode_config_reset()
and drm_dev_register(). I assumed this was the general practice followed by
most kms drivers. I.,e the kms driver defers probe until all connector
related modules are inserted, and only then proceed to create a drm device.
The problem, though, is the panel driver needs the MIPI DSI host to
exist to call mipi_dsi_device_register_full() during the probe process.
The adv7533 driver gets around this by registering the DSI device in the
bridge attach step, but drm_panel doesn't have an attach step.
I'm not sure how we can get around this. We had discussion about this on irc
recently, but couldn't come up with a good conclusion. We could come up with a
panel_attach() callback to make it similar to bridges, but that's just us avoiding
the real issue.
How about making DSI dev registration fully asynchronous, that is, DSI
devs declared in the DT under the DSI host node will be
registered/attached at probe time, and devs using another control bus
(like the adv7533 controller over i2c) will be registered afterwards.
That implies moving the drm_brige registration logic outside of the DSI
host ->probe() path. The idea would be to check if all devs connected
to the DSI bus are ready at dsi_host->attach() time. If they are, we
can finally register the XXX -> DSI bridge. If they're not (because
some devs connected to the DSI bus have not been probed yet), then we
do not register the drm_bridge and wait for the next dsi_host->attach()
event.
With this solution, I think we can avoid the chicken&egg problem where
the adv7533 dev is waiting for the DSI host to be probed to be able to
register a DSI dev with mipi_dsi_device_register_full() and the DSI
host needs all devs to be registered to not return -EPROBE_DEFER.
I've now tried having mipi_dsi_device_register_full() succeed early and
just do the device-add part when the host shows up. The problem is
there's still mipi_dsi_attach(), which needs to be delayed until the
panel driver fills in the rest of mipi_dsi_device's fields. Why aren't
those part of the info?
In the past, the only way to create mipi_dsi_devices was to add them as
children DT nodes under the DSI host node. The KMS driver calls
mipi_dsi_host_register(), which resulted in the creation of all the
children mipi_dsi_devices. The DSI host was still unaware of parameters
like number of lanes, mode_flags etc. mipi_dsi_attach() was a way by
which the DSI device could share these with its DSI host. Another use
of mipi_dsi_attach()/detach() is if the panel driver wants to notify
the DSI host an update in one of the device's fields (for example, a
change in the number of lanes).
We've recently added another way of creating mipi_dsi_devices (i.e, by
making a driver call mipi_dsi_device_register_full) for cases where there
isn't a DT representation of the DSI device.
For the second method, the need to call mipi_dsi_attach() separately becomes
sort of redundant. We could consider embedding the other mipi_dsi_device
fields (lanes etc) in mipi_dsi_device_info itself, and invoke the DSI host's
->attach() callback through mipi_dsi_device_register_full() itself. Would
that help resolving your issue?
Archit
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
