On 19 June 2017 at 17:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Although header is included only once but still having an include guard
> is a good practice. To avoid confusion, add SoC prefix to existing
> Exynos5433 header include guard.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/video/exynos5433_decon.h | 6 +++---
> include/video/exynos7_decon.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/video/exynos5433_decon.h b/include/video/exynos5433_decon.h
> index 78957c9626f5..b30362da5692 100644
> --- a/include/video/exynos5433_decon.h
> +++ b/include/video/exynos5433_decon.h
> @@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
> * published by the Free Software Foundationr
> */
>
> -#ifndef EXYNOS_REGS_DECON_H
> -#define EXYNOS_REGS_DECON_H
> +#ifndef EXYNOS5433_REGS_DECON_H
> +#define EXYNOS5433_REGS_DECON_H
>
Drop the _REGS_ part from the guard on each header? The file name/path
does not have it, plus it'll save some WTF moments when
exynos{5433,7}_regs_decon.h comes about.
Regards,
Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
