On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 10:21:02PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > 于 2017年6月7日 GMT+08:00 下午10:19:57, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写到: > >On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> 于 2017年6月7日 GMT+08:00 下午5:43:43, Maxime Ripard > ><maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 写到: > >> >On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 03:03:47AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > >> >> >You should also expand function sun4i_drv_node_is_tcon() at > >> >sun4i_drv.c > >> >> >with > >> >> >new entries, but I'm not sure if this fits in this patch. > >> >> > >> >> Instead I think it should be renamed to something like > >> >> "sun4i_drv_node_is_tcon_with_ch0". > >> > > >> >I'm not sure, or at least, it shouldn't make any difference, since > >> >TCON without a channel 0 will not have an endpoint 0, so this will > >be > >> >dealt with already. > >> > >> But that will prevent new coders from add CH1-less TCON > >> compatibles to this function. > > > >Why? We already have such TCONs (like the A33's, or V3S') in that > >function. > > Sorry, CH0-less. That's not really an issue I think, since the endpoint 0 will not be there on those TCONs, the code will bail out. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
