On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 15:55 +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > On Wed, 2017-05-10 at 16:17 +0300, Leonard Crestez wrote: > > > > Not having an endpoint bound in DT should not cause a failure here, > > there are fallbacks. So explicitly accept a missing endpoint. > > > > This behavior change was introduced by refactoring in drm_of parsing > > code and it should not require dts changes. > > > > In particular this fixes imx6qdl-sabreauto boards. > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c > > index 8fb801f..8b05ecb 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c > > @@ -673,7 +673,7 @@ static int imx_ldb_bind(struct device *dev, struct device *master, void *data) > > ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(child, > > imx_ldb->lvds_mux ? 4 : 2, 0, > > &channel->panel, &channel->bridge); > > - if (ret) > > + if (ret && ret != -ENODEV) > > return ret; > > > > /* panel ddc only if there is no bridge */ > Thank you, applied to imx-drm/fixes. > > regards > Philipp How are such fixes going to make their way upstream? It's been almost a month and this patch did not get into either linux-next or torvalds/master or anywhere other than pza/imx-drm/fixes. -- Regards, Leonard _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
