On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 06:10:15PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The DDC parent clock on the A31 SoC is also conveniently named > "hdmi-ddc", which results in a name collision when the hdmi driver > registers its internal DDC divider clock. > > Rename the internal clock to "hdmi-ddc-divider". > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c > index e1071838f487..9a6b6243e977 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_ddc_clk.c > @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int _sun4i_ddc_create(struct sun4i_hdmi *hdmi, struct clk *parent, > if (!ddc) > return -ENOMEM; > > - init.name = "hdmi-ddc"; > + init.name = "hdmi-ddc-divider"; Can't we rename the CCU clock instead? Having the clock called hdmi-ddc being the actual clock output on the DDC bus feels more natural. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
