Hi Tomi, Thank you for the patch. On Wednesday 17 May 2017 10:56:44 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > When rotating 90/270 + mirroring with YUV422, the end result will have > adjacent pixels swapped. The problem is that > dispc_ovl_set_rotation_attrs() has wrong rotation values for these > cases. > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c index 80c75e5913cb..7261f87b2a5b > 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c > @@ -1817,13 +1817,13 @@ static void dispc_ovl_set_rotation_attrs(enum > omap_plane_id plane, u8 rotation, vidrot = 2; > break; > case DRM_ROTATE_270: > - vidrot = 1; > + vidrot = 3; > break; > case DRM_ROTATE_180: > vidrot = 0; > break; > case DRM_ROTATE_90: > - vidrot = 3; > + vidrot = 1; How about ordering the cases in 0, 90, 180, 270 order ? That would look cleaner for both the case label and the vidrot value. I would actually have done so in the patch where you replaced OMAP_DSS_ROT_* with DRM_ROTATE_*. Apart from this, Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > break; > } > } else { -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel