On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 19:52, Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> While the DRM has historically targeted 3D acceleration, that is not a >> requirement to use the DRM KMS modesetting API. The current fb API >> has no concept of display controllers or connectors or overlays, etc. >> To match it to modern hardware, it needs a major overhaul. Why create >> a new modern fb interface that's largely the same as DRM KMS? What if >> we just consider the KMS API as the new fb API? If there are any >> inadequacies in the DRM KMS API we would be happy to work out any >> changes. > > I admit I didn't look for it, but does there exist a sample DRM KMS driver > for dumb frame buffer hardware with one fixed video mode? Not at the moment. However, there drivers for AMD, Intel, and nvidia chips as well patches for a number of ARM SoCs that are in the process of moving upstream. Also, Matt Turner wrote a KMS driver for 3D labs glint hardware that is pretty simple (single display controller, single DAC, etc.), however it hasn't been merged upstream yet. http://code.google.com/p/google-summer-of-code-2010-xorg/downloads/detail?name=Matt_Turner.tar.gz&can=2&q= His kernel git tree was on kernel.org so it's down at the moment, hence the link to the tarball. Alex _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel