On 15 May 2017 at 18:13, Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 2017-05-15 09:23 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 14 May 2017 at 18:26, Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Add DRM_ROTATE_ and DRM_REFLECT_ defines to the UAPI as a convenience.
>>>
>>> Ideally the DRM_ROTATE_ and DRM_REFLECT_ property ids are looked up
>>> through the atomic API, but realizing that userspace is likely to take
>>> shortcuts and assume that the enum values are what is sent over the
>>> wire.
>>>
>>> As a result these defines are provided purely as a convenience to
>>> userspace applications.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 1 +
>>> include/drm/drm_blend.h | 18 ------------
>>> include/uapi/drm/drm.h | 73
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
>>> index bc5575960ebc..bdb27434bb10 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c
>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>>> #include <linux/errno.h>
>>> #include <linux/export.h>
>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>> +#include <drm/drm.h>
>>> #include <drm/drmP.h>
>>> #include <drm/drm_rect.h>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_blend.h b/include/drm/drm_blend.h
>>> index 13221cf9b3eb..d149a63b893b 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_blend.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_blend.h
>>> @@ -29,24 +29,6 @@
>>> struct drm_device;
>>> struct drm_atomic_state;
>>>
>> Since the defines are used here, move the above include to this file?
>
>
> Done.
>
>
>>
>>> -/*
>>> - * Rotation property bits. DRM_ROTATE_<degrees> rotates the image by the
>>> - * specified amount in degrees in counter clockwise direction.
>>> DRM_REFLECT_X and
>>> - * DRM_REFLECT_Y reflects the image along the specified axis prior to
>>> rotation
>>> - *
>>> - * WARNING: These defines are UABI since they're exposed in the rotation
>>> - * property.
>>> - */
>>> -#define DRM_ROTATE_0 BIT(0)
>>> -#define DRM_ROTATE_90 BIT(1)
>>> -#define DRM_ROTATE_180 BIT(2)
>>> -#define DRM_ROTATE_270 BIT(3)
>>> -#define DRM_ROTATE_MASK (DRM_ROTATE_0 | DRM_ROTATE_90 | \
>>> - DRM_ROTATE_180 | DRM_ROTATE_270)
>>> -#define DRM_REFLECT_X BIT(4)
>>> -#define DRM_REFLECT_Y BIT(5)
>>> -#define DRM_REFLECT_MASK (DRM_REFLECT_X | DRM_REFLECT_Y)
>>> -
>>> static inline bool drm_rotation_90_or_270(unsigned int rotation)
>>> {
>>> return rotation & (DRM_ROTATE_90 | DRM_ROTATE_270);
>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
>>> index 42d9f64ce416..d7140b0091bc 100644
>>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
>>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm.h
>>
>>
>> drm_mode.h might be a better fit.
>
>
> About this, I don't disagree, but other defines in drm_mode.h seem to be
> prefixed with DRM_MODE_ which this isn't which is why I didn't put it there.
>
> Knowing this, do you still prefer these defines living in drm_mode.h?
>
Feel free to give them a DRM_MODE_ prefix or something else - say
DRM_MODE_PROP_.
AFAICT drm_mode.h deals with KMS specifics and the prop_id mentioned
in the documentation is already there, so it would make sense to add
it there.
-Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
