On 9 May 2017 at 04:54, Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Thanks for taking the time to look at DC. > > I had a couple more questions/comments in regard to the patch you posted on > IRC: http://paste.debian.net/plain/930704 > > My impression is that this item is the most important next step for us: > >> From a quick glance I think what we want instead is: >> - amdgpu_crtc_state and amdgpu_plane_state as following: >> >> struct amdgpu_crtc_state { >> struct drm_crtc_state base; >> struct dc_stream; >> }; > > > Unfortunately as sketched here it doesn't quite mesh with what we currently > have, which is: > > struct stream { > struct core_stream protected; > ... > } > > struct core_stream { > struct dc_stream public; > ... > } > > struct dc_stream { > ... > } > Is there any major reason to keep all those abstractions? Could you collapse everything into struct dc_stream? I haven't looked recently but I didn't get the impression there was a lot of design around what was public/protected, more whatever needed to be used by someone else was in public. Dave. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
