Presumably we can never actually hit this return, but static checkers complain that we should unlock before we return. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c index 3a24788c3185..a7e55c422501 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/fifo/gk104.c @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ gk104_fifo_runlist_commit(struct gk104_fifo *fifo, int runl) case NVKM_MEM_TARGET_NCOH: target = 3; break; default: WARN_ON(1); - return; + goto unlock; } nvkm_wr32(device, 0x002270, (nvkm_memory_addr(mem) >> 12) | @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ gk104_fifo_runlist_commit(struct gk104_fifo *fifo, int runl) & 0x00100000), msecs_to_jiffies(2000)) == 0) nvkm_error(subdev, "runlist %d update timeout\n", runl); +unlock: mutex_unlock(&subdev->mutex); } _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
