On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:25:01AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Mikko Perttunen <cyndis@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think we have a "policy" on Tegra that the DMA API will never allocate > > using the IOMMU (Thierry can elaborate on this), which is why I wrote the > > code with that assumption. Essentially, we have made the DMA API into the > > API that allocates CPU-visible memory. > > I don't think this can be a per-platform policy. > > > Considering that, I'm wondering if we can just have a temporary local > > dma_addr_t and then cast that to phys_addr_t, combined with a good comment? > > That was my first approach, and it does address the warning, but > I did not send it because it still felt too wrong. Sounds to me like the warning is justified - it's saying that there's something not right here which could be a problem. So I'd say, don't fix the warning, it's doing its job, highlighting a potential problem with the code. (Consider hiding the warning and then running on a platform where the assumptions are broken.) -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
