On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 11:55:24AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 12.04.2017 um 06:57 schrieb Dave Airlie:
> >+static int amdgpu_sem_lookup_and_remove(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
> >+ uint32_t handle)
> >+{
> >+ int r;
> >+ struct dma_fence *old_fence;
> >+
> >+ r = drm_syncobj_replace_fence(p->filp, handle, NULL);
> >+ if (r)
> >+ return r;
> >+ dma_fence_put(old_fence);
>
> Am I wrong or is old_fence not initialized here?
>
> Additional to that what happens when the fence in the sync object
> was changed while we do the CS? Or even worse the handle got
> assigned to a new sync object.
We either ww_mutex the lot, or regard that as a userspace race where the
order between the two concurrent CS emits is undefined and who gets the
in-semaphore is happenstance.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
