On 03/04/17 01:31 AM, Keith Packard wrote: > Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I'm also not sure whether we really want sub-leases in v1, that's easy >> to add later on, but for now just complicates stuff. Main compositor >> should be a full master, VR can be the first lease level, we don't >> need more I think for now? > > We've discussed how leases might be used to implement multi-user > support, so offering sub-leases means that environment could also > support leasing resources out from the users session. > > We also just don't know how useful it might be until we explore the > space a bit more. It should only be added upstream once it's clear that it's useful. > Given that it takes years to get new features into distributions, I > tend to error on the side of generality. Why would it take years? Distros seem to generally use the latest upstream kernel release available at release/freeze. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
