2017-04-05 12:05 GMT+02:00 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 14:50 +0200, Christian Gmeiner wrote: > [...] >> > Is this on a non-plus i.MX6? Maybe are missing the LDB DI clock glitch >> > fixes (commits 5d283b083800, 03d576f202e8, and f13abeff2cde)? >> >> Yes it is a non-plus i.MX6D and all those three patches are included in >> 4.9.20 (which I am using right now), But maybe my dts is not that good as I >> used it for a longer time without any changes to it. It is really time to get >> those upstream. > > Which device tree is this? Can I see it? > sure: https://hastebin.com/ekiyiticac.cpp >> At the moment I have this artifact in it: >> >> &clks { >> assigned-clocks = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_LDB_DI0_SEL>, >> <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_LDB_DI1_SEL>; >> assigned-clock-parents = <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL5_VIDEO_DIV>, >> <&clks IMX6QDL_CLK_PLL5_VIDEO_DIV>; >> }; >> >> I am not to 100% sure if PLL5 is what I want - need. > > I'd use PLL5 for LVDS only if there is no other clock that can provide > the required rate, or if thee is no other display. Is LVDS the only user > of PLL5 or does this maybe conflict with HDMI? > No HDMI - here is clk_summary output: https://hastebin.com/ugesivojep.rb greets -- Christian Gmeiner, MSc https://www.youtube.com/user/AloryOFFICIAL https://soundcloud.com/christian-gmeiner _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
