Hi all Up until now I've only ever used the most basic features of git, so I've had to do some research into how to best/cleanly extract Phillipps patches so that I can include his changes into an Arch kernel PKGBUILD. I think the following should work: git clone https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git cd linux git fetch https://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git tags/v4.10-ipu-dp-plane-fix git checkout FETCH_HEAD git whatchanged -p origin/master..FETCH_HEAD > sabre-lite.patch I should then be able to include that patch in a 4.11-rc4 PKGBUILD - I'll give it a go this weekend and see if it applies and builds OK but please let me know if anyone sees any flaws in this procedure. Thanks On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Dan MacDonald <allcoms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Philipp > > I moved house again on Sunday - that is the second time in two months. > I won't bore you with the details but it means I've not had much time > to myself recently and why I've not been able to test this patch. > > As I was saying previously, the only way I can reliably test this is > to do it 'the Arch way' by creating a new kernel package with your > patch rolled in. Doing it that way means I can't directly use your git > repo in the PKGBUILD but instead we need to create a patch that can be > applied against > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/testing/linux-4.11-rc3.tar.xz > which is what is downloaded and patched by the armv7-rc PKGBUILD as > feched from: > > git clone https://github.com/archlinuxarm/PKGBUILDs.git > > See the PKGBUILD under core/linux-armv7-rc. There is a short guide on > how Arch/ABS expects its patches to be formatted here: > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Patching_in_ABS > > I'm surprised I'm the only Arch user on this list - I thought someone > else would already have a dev kernel PKGBUILD for me but apparently > not? > > If you really don't have time to create a patch against the latest rc > tarball I can give it a go but I can see me making a royal mess of it! > :) > > Thanks > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> On Fri, 2017-03-10 at 11:11 +0000, Dan MacDonald wrote: >>> Should your patches work fine under 4.11-rc1 Phillipp or do I need to >>> test againt the very latest git? I realise that would be preferred. >> >> The patches from the v4.10-ipu-dp-plane-fix-2 tag should work under >> v4.11-rc1, they are applied on top of v4.11-rc1 in the imx-drm/next >> branch. >> >> regards >> Philipp >> _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
