I think the initial experiment worked fairly well, and the kickstarting of a review (well, ack/best practices really) market seems to work ok-ish too. I think we can try to make it (slowly) scale to more drivers, with driver teams interested in being part of drm-misc. I do think we need to be careful though, to make sure we don't overstretch the review/mentoring bandwidth and can improve process&tooling as we go. Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Mark Yao <mark.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> --- drm-misc.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drm-misc.rst b/drm-misc.rst index b6d01f2c7c2b..e4409cce8178 100644 --- a/drm-misc.rst +++ b/drm-misc.rst @@ -105,8 +105,8 @@ Small Drivers ============= Small drivers, where a full tree is overkill, can be maintained in drm-misc. For -now it's just an experiment with a few drivers to figure out a working process. -Slightly different rules apply: +now there's just a few drivers maintained in drm-misc, but we can slowly add +more to figure out how to make this scale. Slightly different rules apply: * Small is measured in patches merged per kernel release. The occasional big patch series is still acceptable if it's not a common thing (e.g. new hw -- 2.11.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
