On 13.03.2017 09:15, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Mikko Perttunen wrote:Add support for sync file-based prefences and postfences to job submission. Fences are passed to the Host1x implementation. Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c index 64dff8530403..bf4a2a13c17d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/drm.c @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ #include <linux/bitops.h> #include <linux/host1x.h> #include <linux/iommu.h> +#include <linux/sync_file.h> #include <drm/drm_atomic.h> #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h> @@ -344,6 +345,7 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context, struct drm_tegra_submit *args, struct drm_device *drm, struct drm_file *file) { + struct host1x *host1x = dev_get_drvdata(drm->dev->parent); unsigned int num_cmdbufs = args->num_cmdbufs; unsigned int num_relocs = args->num_relocs; unsigned int num_waitchks = args->num_waitchks; @@ -361,6 +363,11 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context, if (args->num_syncpts != 1) return -EINVAL; + /* Check for unrecognized flags */ + if (args->flags & ~(DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_WAIT_FENCE_FD | + DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_CREATE_FENCE_FD)) + return -EINVAL; + job = host1x_job_alloc(context->channel, args->num_cmdbufs, args->num_relocs, args->num_waitchks); if (!job) @@ -372,19 +379,27 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context, job->class = context->client->base.class; job->serialize = true; + if (args->flags & DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_WAIT_FENCE_FD) { + job->prefence = sync_file_get_fence(args->fence); + if (!job->prefence) { + err = -ENOENT; + goto put_job; + } + } + while (num_cmdbufs) { struct drm_tegra_cmdbuf cmdbuf; struct host1x_bo *bo; if (copy_from_user(&cmdbuf, cmdbufs, sizeof(cmdbuf))) { err = -EFAULT; - goto fail; + goto put_fence; } bo = host1x_bo_lookup(file, cmdbuf.handle); if (!bo) { err = -ENOENT; - goto fail; + goto put_fence; } host1x_job_add_gather(job, bo, cmdbuf.words, cmdbuf.offset); @@ -398,19 +413,19 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context, &relocs[num_relocs], drm, file); if (err < 0) - goto fail; + goto put_fence; } if (copy_from_user(job->waitchk, waitchks, sizeof(*waitchks) * num_waitchks)) { err = -EFAULT; - goto fail; + goto put_fence; } if (copy_from_user(&syncpt, (void __user *)(uintptr_t)args->syncpts, sizeof(syncpt))) { err = -EFAULT; - goto fail; + goto put_fence; } job->is_addr_reg = context->client->ops->is_addr_reg; @@ -423,20 +438,54 @@ int tegra_drm_submit(struct tegra_drm_context *context, err = host1x_job_pin(job, context->client->base.dev); if (err) - goto fail; + goto put_fence; err = host1x_job_submit(job); if (err) - goto fail_submit; + goto unpin_job;Shouldn't all error-unwinding gotos after this jump to the unpin_job label as well? Seems like they all jump to put_fence instead, which I think would leave the job pinned on failure.
After host1x_job_submit is succesfully called, host1x's job tracking owns the job and will call unpin on it once it finishes or times out, so we cannot unpin it from here.
- args->fence = job->syncpt_end; + if (args->flags & DRM_TEGRA_SUBMIT_CREATE_FENCE_FD) { + struct dma_fence *fence; + struct sync_file *file; + + fence = host1x_fence_create( + host1x, host1x_syncpt_get(host1x, job->syncpt_id), + job->syncpt_end); + if (!fence) { + err = -ENOMEM; + goto put_fence; + } + + file = sync_file_create(fence); + if (!file) { + dma_fence_put(fence); + err = -ENOMEM; + goto put_fence; + } + + err = get_unused_fd_flags(O_CLOEXEC); + if (err < 0) { + dma_fence_put(fence); + goto put_fence; + } + + fd_install(err, file->file); + args->fence = err; + } else { + args->fence = job->syncpt_end; + } + if (job->prefence) + dma_fence_put(job->prefence); host1x_job_put(job); return 0; -fail_submit: +unpin_job: host1x_job_unpin(job); -fail: +put_fence: + if (job->prefence) + dma_fence_put(job->prefence);Since we already have a conditional to check for usage of fence, I'm wondering if we can simplify this a little and leave out the put_fence label altogether, like so: unpin_job: host1x_job_unpin(job); put_job: if (job->prefence) dma_fence_put(job->prefence); host1x_job_put(job);
Yes, that seems like a good idea.
Thierry
Cheers, Mikko. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
