On Wed, 08 Mar 2017, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 08 Mar 2017, Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 09:35:11PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >>> Gabriel Krisman reported these warnings when building the documentation: >>> >>> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c:1165: warning: No description found >>> for parameter 'crtc' >>> ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c:1166: warning: No description found >>> for parameter 'crtc' >>> >> >> I've now added htmldocs build to my pre-merge build testing so I'll hopefully >> catch this earlier (no promises). > > Dear 0day folks, what's the status of 'make htmldocs' build testing on > patches posted to dri-devel and intel-gfx mailing lists? I see > occasional mails reporting issues in documentation, but sometimes there > are no reports. > > And while I'm reaching out, have we ensured testing of the new repos and > branches we have? There's the drm-misc and drm-tip repos. drm-tip is an > integration tree, and other repos and branches feed to it. If you don't > have anything such, we should probably discuss whether it's best to test > the individual trees, or the integration tree, or both. Okay, I see that you've sent reports about drm-tip, but there's nothing on the drm-misc branches after it moved from drm-intel.git to a repo of its own. Is drm-tip enough, or should we expand on drm-misc? BR, Jani. > > > BR, > Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
