On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 10:56:49AM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've always tried to have all major new features sent to Dave by rc5, > so no problems with the timelines. Dave and Linus have generally been > ok with new asic support at strange times assuming it has minimal > impact on existing support. Our code release dates rarely line up > well with kernel cycles, but we can manage. Well, you were also once the target of a rant because of too recent commit dates that turned out to have an entirely innocuous explanation: https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg87996.html In a follow-up, Linus said "I want to at least be able to fool myself into thinking that downstream has really worked hard at validating what they send me". https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg87999.html So since he was asking for it, maybe use something like: GIT_AUTHOR_DATE=`date --date="8 weeks ago"` \ GIT_COMMITTER_DATE=`date --date="4 weeks ago"` \ git commit --amend --date Best regards ;-) Lukas _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
