Re: KMS backlight ABI proposition

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Can we at least suggest they try, again with a similar disclaimer that "this might not work in practice"? The more I think about it, a normalized 0-100 API doesn't really simplify implementations for anybody, especially if we don't have a natural step level.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 6:00 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, "Jasper St. Pierre" <jstpierre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Instead of normalizing to 100, I think we should expose a max level, and
> specify that's max brightness. Every single step in the range should have a
> visible difference in output lumens.

The drivers can't guarantee that.

BR,
Jani.


--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center



--
  Jasper
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux