On 18 February 2017 at 03:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 21:27 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote: >> Hi Ben, > > .../... > >> Not sure why you opted for splitting each suggestion in separate >> email, but it seems to have lead to a [serious] bugfix to go >> unnoticed. > > Many thanks for your reviews. I've put a tentative new series there > > https://github.com/ozbenh/linux-ast > > I'm waiting for Aspeed to test on Monday on their HW (they can test > the POST code) and I'll be testing again on POWER8 and POWER9 this > week-end. If all goes well I'll send the new series to the list then. > Out of curiosity - can you try testing with and w/o the ddr_test_2500 bug fix(?). Would be interesting to see if any of the omitted code [in ast_dram_init_2500] has noticeable effect. > I've changed my refactoring of mmc_test_* to be closer to the original > code as I had missed a difference in loop exit condition. > The series looks a lot, better. Thank you for addressing my suggestions ! Regards Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
